-
The experience of South Asia shows that the service delivery approach has largely failed to truly end hunger.
-
Resource
limited: Service-delivery programs depend on government
budgets, which are never large enough to meet more than a small
fraction of the needs.
-
Unsustainable:
Programs stop when the funding stops.
-
Insensitive to local conditions: In a region with more than 1 billion people, it is hard for top-down approaches to be sensitive to local realities. Plans are often unable to take into account changing conditions in local communities.
-
Bypass the poor:
The majority of South Asia’s, and the world’s, poor and hungry never have access to the programs that are supposed to provide services for them.
-
Inefficiency: The late Indian Prime Minister Rajiv
Gandhi stated that only 15% of government funds for the poor
ever reached them. Some experts estimate that since the early 1950’s, $100 billion in aid has been given
worldwide to less developed countries. Less than 1% of that money has actually reached the bottom 20% of humanity.
-
Encouragement to corruption:
Top-down government programs also create an opening for corruption, since money must pass through the hands of people in power before it can reach the beneficiaries. Corruption has now seeped into all levels and sectors of South Asian society.
-
Mindset of dependency:
Most importantly, top-down, service delivery programs create a mindset of dependency among
grassroots people, rather than focusing on people's own creativity and strength. Many local people feel alienated by central planning, since they have very little say in initiatives as they are developed.